On June 14th 2016, I emailed all who subscribe to
11 Update for feedback as we enter into discussions for the 2017 budget. My
office and I are collecting your feedback, and compiling results of what you,
residents of Ward 11 and citizens of Calgary wish to see out of the budget for
I attempted to explain that through a number of media
interviews and as often can happen, particularly in print media where space
often overrides context, some meaning got lost. So, I would like to give you an
understanding of where I am coming from as we have this conversation. And
indeed, it must be a conversation between you, me, and the rest of the City.
These types of decisions require us to consider the desires and needs not just
for ourselves but also for our fellow Calgarians.
Developing a budget is always a balancing act. Essentially,
with our taxes and fees we are buying services. Garbage collection, clean
water, emergency response, parks and recreation, and libraries, to name just a
few, are all services we receive as a result of taxes. Delivering those
services is balanced by what we can afford and our revenues.
The original tax rate for 2017 set out in our 4 year plan
two years ago was for a tax increase of 4.7%.
Since then, with ongoing work by city administration, we have identified
that we can maintain service levels as they exist today with a 3.2% tax
increase for 2017. Over the past two years, city administration has found $86
million per year in efficiencies. That was a $50 million reduction in 2015, a
further $36 million in 2016, and now they have committed to finding another $15
million in 2017. That is $100 million per year of efficiencies without
Council received that information earlier in June and
subsequently asked Administration to bring us back scenarios for tax increases
ranging between 3.2% down to a 0% tax for 2017.
To achieve a 0% tax increase we would need to identify about $66 million
in cuts from our budget. With the already achieved $100 million in efficiencies,
there are limited options left.
$66 million is not a small amount. To put that number into
context, the funding for the Public Library is $40 million per year. Our snow
clearing budget is $35 million per year. From a property tax perspective, the
impact of every 1% increase results in an $18 dollar per year increase on the
average home (today that is a home assessed at $480,000).
As well, property taxes go towards the operating budget and
not the capital budget. So our construction projects around the City, from
roads & bridges, to bikeways and BRTs do not affect the property tax. An
example would be that the construction of a fire hall is not paid for through
property taxes, but the firefighters in that hall are.
A second piece to consider as we look at our overall
operating budget, primarily funded through property taxes, is that the majority
of the City of Calgary’s labour force is unionized. As such, wages and salaries
are determined by collective agreements across several bargaining units. These
are contracts that were negotiated in good faith by all parties. 2017 marks the
final year of many of the collective agreements across the City, so we can
definitely anticipate a different negotiating environment leading to the next
As well, City Council wages have been determined by policy
to be adjusted by the average change in weekly salaries of Alberta workers. If
the average wage across the province goes up by 1%, Council salaries are
adjusted accordingly. If the average wage goes down, which is where we are
right now, then Council salaries will go down the same amount. I am a firm
believer that City Council should not be adjusting or setting their wages
themselves. That is why I support the formula established by a committee of citizens
who examined Council compensation and determined the manner in which
compensation is adjusted.
I very much would like to get the tax increase as low as
possible. I want to have the discussion of which services we could see less of.
I am certainly not advocating that we close our libraries or eliminate our snow
clearing program. We will need to look across all departments & services to
consider where we find the cuts. It has been typical of Council to exclude
police and fire from budget cuts. With those two areas being among our largest
budget spends, that increases the impact on other departments such as transit,
parks, community and neighbourhood services, and recreation.
I asked to hear from you on: Which areas would you be
willing to reduce service in? Which are the most important to you to maintain
service? How do you feel about exempting Fire and Police from budget cuts? What
level of tax increase would you be willing to accept? (Understanding that we
would all prefer a 0% increase!). If you have not yet contributed, and this is a
conversation you would like to participate in, please contact
my office to share your thoughts.
Interested in the Budget Discussion? Check out Part 1 & Part 3.
This content represents the personal views and opinions of the Ward Councillor and should not be taken as a statement of policy of The City of Calgary. The inclusion of any external content does not imply endorsement by The City of Calgary.